Officers Law enforcement in the United States is one of three major components of the system of the United States, along with and. Although each component operates semi-independently, the three collectively form a chain leading from investigation of suspected criminal activity to administration of criminal punishment.

Police science, law or other course of study related to law enforcement or security. ➢ Can evidence a certificate of completion from a federal, state, county or municipal law enforcement academy or training facility which is comparable in hours and curriculum to the training established by the Florida. Criminal Justice. (Wix-Logo) Create a Wix site! 100s of templates. No coding needed. Start now >>Annabelle HOME ABOUT. Download Free Florida Law Enforcement Handbook Miami. July 2, 2017. Hauppauge 950Q Mac Os X. July 2, 2017 Vero Visi V20 Crack. July 2, 2017 Download Game Prime World Defenders Full. July 2, 2017.

Law enforcement operates primarily through governmental police agencies. The law-enforcement purposes of these agencies are the investigation of suspected criminal activity, referral of the results of investigations to the courts, and the temporary detention of suspected criminals pending judicial action. Law enforcement agencies, to varying degrees at different levels of government and in different agencies, are also commonly charged with the responsibilities of deterring criminal activity and preventing the successful commission of crimes in progress. Other duties may include the service and enforcement of,, and other orders of the courts. Law enforcement agencies are also involved in providing first response to emergencies and other threats to; the protection of certain public facilities and; the maintenance of public order; the protection of public officials; and the operation of some correctional facilities (usually at the local level). Officers standing by during the 2005 At the federal level, there exists both federal police, who possess full federal authority as given to them under (U.S.C.), and federal law enforcement agencies, who are authorized to enforce various laws at the federal level. Both police and law enforcement agencies operate at the highest level and are endowed with police roles; each may maintain a small component of the other (for example, the ).

The agencies have nationwide jurisdiction for enforcement of federal law. All federal agencies are limited by the U.S. Code to investigating only matters that are explicitly within the power of the federal government. However, federal investigative powers have become very broad in practice, especially since the passage of the. The (DOJ) is responsible for most law enforcement duties at the federal level. It includes the (FBI), the (DEA), the (ATF), the, the (BOP) and others.

The (DHS) is another branch with numerous federal law enforcement agencies reporting to it. (CBP), (ICE), (FAMS), (USSS), (USCG), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), and the (TSA) are some of the agencies that report to DHS. It should be noted that the United States Coast Guard is assigned to the in the event of war.

At a crime or disaster scene affecting large numbers of people, multiple jurisdictions, or broad geographic areas, many police agencies may be involved by agreements, for example the responded to the natural disaster. Command in such situations remains a complex and flexible issue. In accordance with the, as opposed to or, structure of the, the national (federal) government is not authorized to execute general police powers by the. Each of the United States' 50 (referred to simply as ' in the United States despite their lack of full [ ]) retain their own police, military and domestic law-making powers.

The US Constitution gives the federal government the power to deal with foreign affairs and interstate affairs (affairs between the states). For policing, this means that if a non-federal crime is committed in a US state and the does not flee the state, the federal government has no jurisdiction. However, once the fugitive crosses a state line he violates the federal law of interstate flight and is subject to federal jurisdiction, at which time federal law enforcement agencies may become involved.

Massachusetts State Police Troopers Most operate statewide that provide law enforcement duties, including and state patrols. They may be called or, and are normally part of the state. In addition, the 's office of each state has its own. In, the fulfill this role though they have their history in the period before Texas became a state.

Various departments of state governments may have their own enforcement divisions, such as,,,,, environmental (fish and game/wildlife) or conservation officers (who have full police powers and statewide jurisdiction). In Colorado, for instance, the Department of Revenue has its own investigative branch, as do many of the state-funded universities.

County [ ] Also known as and, law enforcement is provided by sheriffs' departments or offices and county police. County police [ ]. Main article: County police tend to exist only in metropolitan counties and have countywide jurisdiction. In some areas, there is a 's department which only handles minor issues such as service of papers and security for the local courthouse. In other areas, there are no county police and the local sheriff is the exclusive law enforcement agency and acts as both sheriff and county police, which is more common than there being a separate county police force.

County police tend to fall into three broad categories: • Full service - provide the full spectrum of police services to the entire county, irrespective of local communities, and may provide contractual services to within the county. • Limited service - provide services to unincorporated areas of the county (and may provide services to some incorporated areas by contract), and usually provide contractual security police services to special districts within the county. • Restricted service - provide to county owned and operated facilities and parks.

Some may also perform some road patrol duties on county built and maintained roads, and provide support to municipal police departments in the county. Some states maintain in their ' offices.

For example, the Commonwealth of Virginia does not have overlapping County and City jurisdictions, whereas in the other 49 states most municipalities fall within (and share jurisdiction and many other governmental responsibilities with) a County. In Virginia, governmental power flows down from the State (or in Virginia's case, Commonwealth) directly to either a County or an Independent City. Thus, policing in Virginia is more streamlined: the County Sheriff's Office/Department or County Police Department does not overlap with an Independent City Police Department. Unincorporated Townships remain part of their parent County, but may have Town Police Departments to augment their County law enforcement.

Town Police Departments are often small, and may deploy a combination of paid and nonpaid, full and part-time law enforcement officers, including auxiliary officers who typically serve as part-time, unpaid volunteers. If present, Independent City Sheriff's Offices usually follow the Restrictive model shown below for Sheriff's Departments, with limited law enforcement authority including warrant service, jail bailiff, etc. Mutual assistance compacts may exist where neighboring law enforcement agencies will assist each other, however, in addition to State (Commonwealth) law enforcement resources. Sheriffs' offices [ ]. Main article: • Full service - The most common type, provide all traditional law-enforcement functions, including countywide patrol and investigations irrespective of municipal boundaries. • Limited service - along with the above, perform some type of traditional law-enforcement function such as investigations and patrol. This may be limited to duties on county properties (and others by contract) to the performance of these duties in unincorporated areas of the county, and some incorporated areas by contract.

• Restricted service - provide basic court related services such as keeping the, transporting, providing security and other duties with regard to and that are issued by county and state. The sheriff also often conducts sales of in in many jurisdictions, and is often also empowered to conduct seizures of property to satisfy a. In other jurisdictions, these civil process duties are performed by other officers, such as a. • In Texas, the sheriff's office is normally the agency responsible for handling mental health calls. If the situation is dangerous, a sheriff's deputy has the power to take a person to a hospital on a mental health commitment immediately.

However, if the situation is not actively dangerous, a warrant must be sought. With the rise in mental health units across the state, the was formed.

Municipal [ ]. A of the See for a list range from one-officer agencies (sometimes still called the town ) to the 36,600 person-strong. Most municipal agencies take the form (Municipality Name) Police Department. Most have their own police departments.

Metropolitan departments, such as the, have jurisdiction covering multiple communities and municipalities, often over a wide area typically share geographical boundaries within one or more cities or counties. Metropolitan departments have usually been formed by a merger between local agencies, typically several local police departments and often the local sheriff's department or office, in efforts to provide greater efficiency by centralizing command and resources and to resolve jurisdictional problems, often in communities experiencing rapid population growth and, or in neighboring communities too small to afford individual police departments. Some county sheriff's departments, such as the, are contracted to provide full police services to local cities within their counties. Other [ ] See for a list There are other types of specialist police departments with varying jurisdictions. Most of these serve and are known as special district police.

In some states, they serve as little more than, but in states such as California, special district forces are composed of fully sworn peace officers with statewide authority. These agencies can be, school district police,,,, or police departments responsible for protecting government property, such as the former. Some agencies, such as the, have multi-state powers. There are also some private (non-governmental) agencies, such as the.

Puerto Rico Police. Main article: The Puerto Rico Police traces back to 1837, when Spanish governor Francisco Javier de Moreda y Prieto created La Guardia Civil de Puerto Rico (Puerto Rico Civil Guard) to protect the lives and property of Puerto Ricans who at the time were Spanish subjects, and provide police services to the entire island, even though many municipalities maintain their own police force. The United States invaded and took possession of Puerto Rico in July 1898 as a result of the Spanish–American War and has controlled the island as a US territory since then. The Insular Police of Puerto Rico was created on February 21, 1899, under the command of Col. Frank Thacher (US Marine officer during the Spanish–American War), with an authorized strength of 313 sworn officers.

As of 2009, the PRPD had over 17,292 officers. Police functions [ ]. Evidence Response Team Textbooks and scholars have identified three primary police agency functions. The following is cited from The American System of Criminal Justice, by George F. Cole and Christopher E. Smith, 2004, 10th edition, Wadsworth/Thomson Learning: • Order maintenance.

This is the broad mandate to keep the peace or otherwise prevent behaviors which might disturb others. This can deal with things ranging from a barking dog to a fist-fight.

By way of description, Cole and Smith note that police are usually called-on to 'handle' these situations with discretion, rather than deal with them as strict violations of law, though of course their authority to deal with these situations are based in violations of law. • Law enforcement. Those powers are typically used only in cases where the law has been violated and a suspect must be identified and apprehended. Most obvious instances include,,. This is the popular notion of the main police function, but the frequency of such activity is dependent on geography and season.

Services may include rendering, providing tourist information, guiding the disoriented, or acting as educators (on topics such as preventing ). Cole and Smith cited one study which showed 80% of all calls for police assistance did not involve crimes, but this may not be the case in all parts of the country. Because police agencies are traditionally available year-round, 24 hours a day, citizens call upon police departments not only in times of trouble, but also when just inconvenienced. As a result, police services may include roadside auto assistance, providing referrals to other agencies, finding lost pets or property, or checking locks on vacationers' homes.

History [ ] Early policing in American history was based on the which relied heavily on citizen volunteers, watch groups, and a system known as similar to the, which continued until the mid-Nineteenth century. Police reform [ ]. Main article: The militarization of both rural and urban law enforcement has been attributed to the United States' involvement in wars during the 20th century, although some attribute the militarization to the more recent campaigns on and. Historian Charles Beard argues that cultural change during the encouraged the militarization of law enforcement, whereas Harwood argues that the creation of teams and tactical units within law enforcement during the 1960s began such trend. In recent years, the use of military equipment and tactics for community policing and for public order policing has become more widespread under the. The program prompted discussion among lawmakers in 2014 after unrest in Ferguson, Missouri.

President Obama introduced restrictions in 2015 on the transfer of surplus military equipment to police. In 2017, the Trump administration announced it will reinstate the program. Styles of policing [ ] Given the broad mandates of police work, and yet having limited resources, police administrators must develop policies to prioritize and focus their activities. Some of the more controversial policies restrict, or even forbid, high-speed vehicular pursuits. Researchers Falcone, Wells, & Weisheit’s describe a historical separation of police models between small towns and larger cities. The distinction has also been defined between rural and urban policing models, which tended to function differently with separate hierarchical systems supporting each.

Three styles of policing develop from a jurisdiction's characteristics, government organization, and choice of police administrators. According to a study by James Q.

Wilson ('Varieties of Police Behavior', 1968, 1978, Harvard University Press), there were three distinct types of policing developed in his study of eight communities. Each style emphasized different police functions, and were linked to specific characteristics of the community the department served. (Wilson's field of study was in the United States, and it is not clear if similar studies have been done for other countries with different governmental organization and laws.) • Watchman. Emphasizes maintaining order, usually found in communities with a declining industrial base, and a blue-collar, mixed ethnic/racial population. This form of policing is implicitly less pro-active than other styles, and certain offenses may be 'overlooked' on a variety of social, legal, and cultural grounds, as long as the public order is maintained.

Smith and Cole comment the broad discretion exercised in this style of policing can result in charges of discrimination, when it appears police treatment of different groups results in the perception that some groups get better treatment than others; • Legalistic. Emphasizes law enforcement and professionalism. This is usually found in reform-minded cities, with mixed socioeconomic composition. Officers are expected to generate a large number of arrests and citations, and act as if there were a single community standard for conduct, rather than different standards for different groups. However, the fact that certain groups are more likely to have law enforcement contact means this strict enforcement of laws may seem overly harsh on certain groups; • Service.

Emphasizes the service functions of police work, usually found in suburban, middle-class communities where residents demand individual treatment. Police in homogeneous communities can view their work as protecting their citizens against 'outsiders', with frequent but often-informal interventions against community members. The uniform make-up of the community means crimes are usually more obvious, and therefore less frequent, leaving police free to deal with service functions, and traffic control. Wilson's study applies to police behavior for the entire department, over time. At any given time, police officers may be acting in a watchman, service, or legalistic function by nature of what they're doing at the time, or temperament, or mood.

Individual officers may also be inclined to one style or another, regardless of supervisor or citizen demands. Community-oriented policing is a shift in policing practices in the U.S. That moved away from standardization and towards a more preventative model where police actively partner with the community it serves. Powers of officers [ ] General powers [ ] Law enforcement officers are granted certain powers to enable them to carry out their duties. When there exists to believe that a person has committed a, a law enforcement officer can and a person, who will be held in a or pending a judicial determination or an. The procedural use of and by law enforcement has raised concerns.

The practice of taking an arrested person on a, often handcuffed, through a public place at some point after the arrest, creating an opportunity for the media to take photographs and video of the event, has also raised concerns. In 2010, the FBI estimated that law enforcement agencies made 13,120,947 arrests (excluding traffic violations). Of those persons arrested, 74.5% were male and 69.4 percent of all persons arrested were white, 28.0 percent were black, and the remaining 2.6 percent were of other races. A law enforcement officer may briefly detain a person upon of involvement in a crime but short of to arrest. Contrary to popular belief and Hollywood-style depictions in TV and movies, merely lawfully detaining a person—in and of itself—does not deprive a person of their Fourth Amendment right against unlawful searches.

Federal, state, and local laws, and individual law enforcement departmental policies govern when, where, how, and upon whom a law enforcement officer may perform a 'pat down,' 'protective search,' or 'Terry frisk,' based on several U.S. Supreme Court decisions (including Terry v. Ohio (1968), Michigan v. Long (1983), and Maryland v. Buie (1990)): In Terry v. Ohio, the landmark decision introducing the term 'Terry frisk,' or 'frisk,' to the broader public: 'Our evaluation of the proper balance that has to be struck in this type of case leads us to conclude that there must be a narrowly drawn authority to permit a reasonable search for weapons for the protection of the police officer, where he has reason to believe that he is dealing with an armed and dangerous individual, regardless of whether he has probable cause to arrest the individual for a crime. The officer need not be absolutely certain that the individual is armed; the issue is whether a reasonably prudent man in the circumstances would be warranted in the belief that his safety or that of others was in danger (italics added).'

The came under scrutiny in 2012 for its use of a program. Civil asset forfeiture [ ]. Main article: The Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement officers may enter a house without knocking if they have “a reasonable suspicion” that announcing their presence would be dangerous or allow a suspect to destroy evidence (for example, by flushing drugs down the toilet). In addition, rules on civil asset forfeiture allow law enforcement officers to seize anything which they can plausibly claim was the proceeds of a crime. The property-owner need not be convicted of that crime; if officers find drugs in a house, they can take cash from the house and possibly the house itself.

Commentators have said these rules provide an incentive for law enforcement officers to focus on drug-related crimes rather than rape and murder investigations. They also provide an incentive to arrest suspected drug-dealers inside their houses, which can be seized, and to raid stash houses after most of their drugs have been sold, when officers can seize the cash. Deadly force [ ].

Main articles: and Use of is often granted to law enforcement officers when the person or persons in question are believed to be an immediate danger to people around them, or when a person poses a significant threat to a law enforcement officer, usually when the officer is at risk of serious bodily injury or death. Most law enforcement agencies establish a and list deadly force as a force of last resort. With this model, agencies try to control excessive use of force. Nonetheless, some question the number of killings by law enforcement officers, including killings of people who are unarmed, raising questions about widespread and ongoing excessive use of force.

Other non-fatal incidents and arrests have raised similar concerns. Accountability [ ]. Main articles:,,, and Several serious cases of police misconduct have raised questions surrounding abuse of powers by individual or groups of officers.

Historical examples include the 's torture of felony suspects between 1972-1991 by and under, 's 1991 beating of and late-1990s LAPD, 's 1970s fatal shootings of (1973) and (1976), the 1980s chokehold of (1983), shootings of (1984) and (1985), the of Mark Davidson (1985), the 1990s torture of and shooting of, the 2000s shootings and record-publicizing of, and, 's torture of suspects in the 1970s to improve then-mayor 's reputation and, 's. Entry qualifications [ ] Requirements [ ] Nearly all U.S. States and the federal government have by law adopted minimum-standard standardized training requirements for all officers with powers of within the state. Many standards apply to in-service as well as training, particularly in the use of, with periodic re-certification required. These standards often comply with standards promoted by the.

These standards typically require a thorough that potential police recruits: • Be a (waived in certain agencies if the applicant is a lawful resident). Further information: Despite these safeguards, some departments have at times relaxed hiring and staffing policies, sometimes in violation of the law, most often in the cases of local departments and federally funded drug task forces facing staffing shortages, attrition, and needs to quickly fill positions. This has included at times the fielding (and sometimes the arming) of uncertified officers (who may be working temporarily in what is supposed to be a provisional limited-duty status prior to certification) and the hiring of itinerant 'gypsy cops', who may have histories of poor performance or misconduct in other departments. Police equipment [ ] Firearms [ ] Police in the United States usually carry a on duty. Many are required to be armed on-duty and often required to have a concealable off-duty handgun.

Among the most common sidearms are models produced by,,,, and, usually in,, (US Secret Service and other Federal Law Enforcement agencies). Until the late 1980s and early 1990s, most US police officers carried, typically in or calibers, as their primary duty weapons. At the time,,, and some models were popular with police officers, most popular being the Smith & Wesson or Colt revolvers.

Since then, most agencies have switched to. Two key events influencing many US police forces to upgrade their primary duty weapons to weapons with greater and round capacity were the 1980 and the 1986.

Some police departments allow qualified officers to carry and/or in their vehicles for additional firepower, typically to be used if a suspect is involved in an situation, or a /barricade incident. Less lethal weapons [ ]. ASP 21' tactical baton in collapsed and expanded states.

Police also often carry an - a, also known as a. The common nightstick and the side handle baton have been replaced in many locations by expandable batons such as the Monadnock Auto-Lock Expandable Baton. One advantage of the collapsible baton is that the wearer can comfortably sit in a patrol vehicle while still wearing the baton on their duty belt. The side handle night stick usually has to be removed before entering the vehicle.

Many departments also use like,,, and shotgun rounds. Another less lethal weapon that police officers often carry is an electroshock gun, also known as a. The handheld electroshock weapon was designed to incapacitate a single person from a distance by using electric current to disrupt voluntary control of muscles. Someone struck by a Taser experiences stimulation of his or her sensory nerves and motor nerves, resulting in strong involuntary muscle contractions. Tasers do not rely only on pain compliance, except when used in Drive Stun mode, and are thus preferred by some law enforcement over non-Taser stun guns and other electronic control weapons. Specialized weapons [ ]. Further information: Uniformed police officers are often issued body armor, typically in the form of a lightweight Level IIA, II or IIIA vest that can be worn under service shirts.

SWAT teams typically wear heavier Level III or IV tactical armored vests, often with steel or ceramic trauma plates, comparable to those worn by U.S. Military personnel engaged in ground operations.

Officers trained in wear specialized heavy protective armor designed to protect them from the effects of an explosion when working around live ordnance. Local have initiated programs to provide law enforcement agencies with higher level vests that provide greater protection and vests for police K-9s as well. Body-worn camera [ ]. Further information: Multiple states have pending body-worn camera legislation that require its law enforcement to be equipped with body-worn cameras when the officers are on duty. Some of these states include California, Washington, and Illinois, among others. Body-worn cameras are video recording devices around three inches long that cost between $129-$900.

There are different body-worn camera models, but a standard body-worn camera includes an on and off switch that enables the image capturing technology to record and store data in the cloud. Body-worn cameras have become standard due to the rise of civilian complaints about police brutality across the nation. Supporters argue that the use of a body-worn camera allows evidence to be viewed from an unbiased perspective. Corporations are currently working on body-worn camera models that will resolve the technology’s limitations such as better audio capturing technology and battery life, to name a few.

Surveillance items that can be used by law enforcement which have been scrutinized also include the due to it's similarities to mass surveillance. Police communications [ ] Radio [ ] Most American police departments are dispatched from a centralized, using, or, more recently, digitally transceivers mounted in their vehicles, with individual officers carrying portable handsets or ear-worn headsets for communication when away from their vehicles. American police cars are also increasingly equipped with mobile data terminals (MDT's)or portable computers linked by radio to a network allowing them access to state information, criminal records, and other important information. Most police communications are now conducted within a regional pool of area telecommunicators or dispatchers using 9-1-1 and 9-1-1 telephone taxation. A large number of police agencies have pooled their 9-1-1 tax resources for Computer Aided Dispatching (CAD) to streamline dispatching and reporting. CAD systems are usually linked to MDT's (see above). National Law Enforcement Telecommunications System [ ] A variety of national, regional, state and local information systems are available to law enforcement agencies in the U.S., with differing purposes and types of information.

One example is the National Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (NLETS), an interstate justice and public safety network owned by the states supporting inquiry into state systems for criminal history, driver’s license and motor vehicle registration, as well as supporting inquiry into federal systems, such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Law Enforcement Support Center, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) National Drug Pointer Index (NDPIX), and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Aircraft Registry, as well as the Government of Canada’s Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC). NLETS operates primarily through a secure private network through which each state has an interface to the network, and all agencies within the state operate through this portal. The federal and international components operate very similarly. Users include all United States and territories, Federal agencies with a justice mission, and certain international agencies. The primary operational site for the network is housed in, with a secure backup site located in the East Central U.S. Through the Nlets network, law enforcement and criminal justice agencies can access a wide range of information, from standard driver license and vehicle queries to criminal history and Interpol information.

Operations consist of nearly 1.5 billion transactions a year to over 1 million PC, mobile and handheld devices in the U.S. And Canada at 45,000 user agencies and to 1.3 million individual users. Dissemination [ ] Police departments share arrest information with third-party news organizations that archive names of citizens and legal allegations in a 'police blotter'. However, if the allegations are dismissed in court a citizen may not petition the third-party for removal.

Number of police [ ] In 2008, federal police employed approx. 120,000 full-time law enforcement officers, authorized to make arrests and carry firearms in the United States.

The 2012 Bureau of Justice Statistics' Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies (CSLLEA), found there were 17,985 state and local law enforcement agencies employing at least one full-time officer or the equivalent in part-time officers. In 2008, state and local law enforcement agencies employed more than 1.1 million people on a full-time basis, including about 765,000 sworn personnel (defined as those with general arrest powers). Agencies also employed approximately 100,000 part-time employees, including 44,000 sworn officers.

From 2004 to 2008, overall full-time employment by state and local law enforcement agencies nationwide increased by about 57,000 (or 5.3%). Sworn personnel increased by about 33,000 (4.6%), and nonsworn employees by about 24,000 (6.9%). From 2004 to 2008, the number of full-time sworn personnel per 100,000 U.S. Residents increased from 250 to 251. From 1992 to 2008, the growth rate for civilian personnel was more than double that of sworn personnel. Local police departments were the largest employer of sworn personnel, accounting for 60% of the total. Sheriffs' offices were next, accounting for 24%.

About half (49%) of all agencies employed fewer than 10 full-time officers. Nearly two-thirds (64%) of sworn personnel worked for agencies that employed 100 or more officers. Changes in personnel numbers [ ] Fifteen of the 50 largest local police departments employed fewer full-time sworn personnel in 2008 than in 2004.

The largest declines were in Detroit (36%), Memphis (23%), New Orleans (13%), and San Francisco (10%). Ten of the 50 largest local police departments reported double-digit increases in sworn personnel from 2004 to 2008. The largest increases were in Phoenix (19%), Prince George's County (Maryland) (17%), Dallas (15%), and Fort Worth (14%). Salary [ ] Salary varies widely for police officers, with most being among the top third of wage-earners, age 25 or older, nationwide.

In May 2012, the overall median was $56,980. The top 10% earned more than $93,450 and bottom 10% less than $33,060. The median wages for police and detective occupations in May 2012 were as follows: • $74,300 for detectives and criminal investigators • $55,270 for police and sheriff’s patrol officers • $55,210 for transit and railroad police • $48,070 for fish and game wardens Gallery [ ] •. • ^ Debusmann, Bernd (October–November 2016).... Retrieved October 4, 2016.

• Langeluttig, Albert (1927). The Department of Justice of the United States. Johns Hopkins Press. Virginia Places.Org.

Retrieved 18 March 2016. Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services. Retrieved 18 March 2016. • Archbold, Carol A. Sage Publication..

• Gregory, Anthony. 'Rise of the Warrior Cop: The Militarization of America's Police Forces.' The Independent Review 19.2 (2014): 271-75. ProQuest Research Library. • Kraska, Peter B. 'Militarizing Criminal Justice: Exploring the Possibilities.' The Journal of Political and Military Sociology 27.2 (1999): 205-15.ProQuest Research Library.

• Kohn, Richard H. 'The Danger of Militarization in an Endless 'War' on Terrorism. Digipower Usb Card Reader Driver. ' The Journal of Military History 73.1 (2008): 177-208.ProQuest Research Library. New York Times. June 8, 2014.

Retrieved December 13, 2014. Retrieved June 8, 2014. International Business Times. August 15, 2014.

Retrieved December 13, 2014. August 14, 2014. Retrieved December 13, 2014. The New York Times. 27 August 2017. Retrieved 29 August 2017.

• Falcone, David N., Edward L. Wells, and Ralph A. 'The Small-Town Police Department.' Policing 25.2 (2002): 371-85. ProQuest Criminal Justice Periodicals Index. • Batten, Ed.

Donna (2010). 'Community-Oriented Policing.' Gale Encyclopedia of American Law (3 ed.). Detroit: Gale.

Pp. 49–51. access-date= requires url= () •. Huffington Post. June 6, 2012. Retrieved December 24, 2013. December 19, 2013. Retrieved December 24, 2013.

Huffington Post. Retrieved December 24, 2013. July 11, 2011. Retrieved May 26, 2014. Law Enforcement Today.

15 October 2012. Retrieved 17 March 2016.

Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School. Retrieved 17 March 2016. Huffington Post. May 15, 2012. Retrieved December 24, 2013.

Archived from on December 30, 2013. Retrieved December 24, 2013. Huffington Post. Retrieved December 24, 2013. The Economist.

March 22, 2014. Retrieved June 8, 2014.

Retrieved December 13, 2014. The Washington Post. May 30, 2015. Retrieved May 31, 2015. The Economist. December 13, 2014.

Retrieved December 13, 2014. Bureau Of Justice Statistics. Retrieved June 6, 2014. November 10, 2013. Retrieved June 6, 2014. December 25, 2013. Retrieved June 6, 2014.

• Sullivan, Larry (2005).. • Suarez, Jonathan.. • The Law Enforcement Oral Board Interview - •. The New York Times. September 10, 2016. Retrieved 1 October 2017. Washington Post.

August 3, 2017. Retrieved 1 October 2017. The Atlantic.

December 2, 2014. Retrieved 1 October 2017. • Barker, Tom (2011). 27 September 2016.

Retrieved 9 February 2017. Human Rights Watch. Retrieved 1 October 2017. Retrieved 2016-11-14.

Retrieved 2016-11-14. • CAPPS, KRISTON (July 30, 2015).. • Wagstaff, Keith (December 2, 2014).. • Ariel, Barak; Farrar, William; Sutherland, Alex (September 2015).. Journal of Quantitative Criminology.

Retrieved 2016-11-13. Retrieved 2016-11-13. Retrieved 2016-11-14. Archived from on June 9, 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-23. Retrieved July 5, 2014.